How does the carbon footprint of concrete outdoor loungers compare to natural stone options?

When choosing outdoor furniture, sustainability is a growing concern. Concrete and natural stone loungers are popular for their durability and aesthetics, but their environmental impacts differ significantly.

Concrete outdoor loungers have a higher carbon footprint due to the energy-intensive production of cement, a key component. The process releases substantial CO2, contributing to global warming. However, some manufacturers use recycled materials or low-carbon cement to mitigate this.

Natural stone options, like granite or limestone, have a lower carbon footprint as they require minimal processing. Quarrying and transportation still emit CO2, but far less than concrete production. Stone is also longer-lasting, reducing replacement frequency.

For eco-conscious buyers, natural stone is generally the greener choice. Yet, innovations in concrete production, such as carbon capture or alternative binders, may narrow this gap in the future. Consider material sourcing, production methods, and lifespan to make the most sustainable decision.